CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?: Newspaper Photographs and Voter Evaluations of Political Candidates Export

The Harvard International Journal Of Press/politics, Vol. 10, No. 4. (October 2005), pp. 98-113.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


quinkell's tags for this article

candidates coverage file-import-09-06-24 information media newspapers perceptions pictures political

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

quinkell has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

RX: 2 (on Jun 24, 2009)

quinkell (public note) - 2009-06-24 06:58:13

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that political coverage in newspapers varies from outlet to outlet in correlation with the political atmosphere of those papers.Visual images from photographs of political candidates published in these newspapers are no exception. Although previous works have examined the importance of visual images on observer evaluations, little work has been done to assess whether differing newspaper photographs of a political candidate can actually shape how potential voters view that candidate. We address this gap in the extant literature through an experiment designed to assess the potential influence of candidate photographs on voter perceptions when partisanship is not available as a heuristic device.The results of our study indicate that newspaper photographs can shape how voters evaluate a candidate's personal traits, their general impression of that candidate,and their decision whether to vote for that candidate.We also found thatwomen and men are affected differently by photographs, with the former influenced more by a positive picture and the latter triggered by a negative one.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.