To insert individual citation into a bibliography in a word-processor,
select your preferred citation style below and drag-and-drop it into the document.
Journal of Library Administration, Vol. 52, No. 6-7. (1 August 2012), pp. 609-625, doi:10.1080/01930826.2012.707957 Key: citeulike:11267112
Formatted Citation
Show HTML
Likes
(beta)
This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.
ABSTRACT Scholarly communication today is in the midst of a healthy and long running crisis that has been good for libraries, good for scholars and good for publishers. It is a reflection of a hypercompetitive academic environment and a ruthless academic winnowing and reward system. Large commercial publishers have successfully manipulated this system with the complicity of library consortia, which has led in turn to the birth of the expensive and at times counter-productive open access movement that later reached its nadir with the problematic SCOAP (Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics) episode. In our obsession with navel gazing we have forgotten the decisive role that China will play in future developments in scholarly communication. This article originally published in Journal of Library Administration, Vol. 51, Issues 5?6, pages 415?431, 2011. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.589335.
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.