CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Evaluation of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function With 16-Slice Computed Tomography, Biplane Cineventriculography, and Two-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Export

Journal of the American College of Cardiology In Focus Issue: Cardiac Imaging, Vol. 48, No. 10. (21 November 2006), pp. 2034-2044.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


rafamayo's tags for this article

cardiology ct evaluation

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

ObjectivesWe sought to compare left ventricular (LV) function assessed with multislice computed tomography (MSCT), biplane cineventriculography (CVG), and transthoracic echocardiography (Echo), with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference standard.BackgroundWith the same data as acquired for noninvasive coronary angiography, MSCT enables registration of myocardial function.MethodsA total of 88 patients (64 men and 24 women) underwent MSCT with 16 x 0.5 mm detector collimation, CVG, and MRI, whereas Echo was retrospectively analyzed in a subset of 30 patients.ResultsRegarding the ejection fraction, the agreement was significantly superior for MSCT than for CVG (+/- 10.2% vs. +/- 16.8%; p ConclusionsOur results indicate that the assessment of global and regional LV function with MSCT is more accurate than with CVG, whereas MSCT is superior to Echo for global function. This suggests that MSCT allows reliable evaluation of global and regional LV function.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.