CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

The changing face of global fisheries—The 1950s vs. the 2000s

by: Reg A. Watson, Daniel Pauly
Marine Policy, Vol. 42 (November 2013), pp. 1-4, doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2013.01.022  Key: citeulike:12161836

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Spatialized catch and effort data, representing the world's marine fisheries in the 1950s and the 2000s are presented in form of cartograms, i.e., global maps in which the surface areas of continents are made proportional to the magnitude of the annual catches and fishing effort by their fleets. This is complemented by an analysis of the flows of seafood between the continents in whose waters the fish were captured, in the 1950s and the 2000s, and the continents where fleets originated. Such broad-brush analyses of temporal changes and trade patterns are helpful to understand major trends of fisheries, which, are increasingly dominated by scarcity of fish, and competition, notably off the coast of West Africa, and in newly accessed polar waters. ⺠Mapped global fisheries catch and effort in cartograms show changes since the 1950s were dominated by European fleets in Atlantic and Asian in the Pacific. ⺠By the 2000s, European share had diminished and Asia's had increased. ⺠Landings are limited by ocean primary productivity, and fleets shift as fisheries fail. ⺠Management will need to take note of important global and regional trends.


rakosaka's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.