Can Pictures Be Arguments? Export

@article{citeulike:1785739, abstract = {Maintains that widening the study of argumentation to include the visual unjustifiably expands common understandings of argument, particularly those that define argument as a two-part, two-sided act. Diversion of attention from the rhetorical functions of pictures; Two-part structure of an argument.}, author = {Fleming, David}, citeulike-article-id = {1785739}, journal = {Argumentation \& Advocacy}, keywords = {advertising, barthes, photography, rhetoric, visual\_culture}, number = {1}, posted-at = {2007-10-18 22:05:57}, priority = {0}, title = {Can Pictures Be Arguments?}, volume = {33}, year = {1996} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1785739 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1785739 N2 - Maintains that widening the study of argumentation to include the visual unjustifiably expands common understandings of argument, particularly those that define argument as a two-part, two-sided act. Diversion of attention from the rhetorical functions of pictures; Two-part structure of an argument. IS - 1 JF - Argumentation & Advocacy TI - Can Pictures Be Arguments? VL - 33 KW - advertising KW - barthes KW - photography KW - rhetoric KW - visual_culture AU - Fleming, David PY - 1996///Summer ER -