CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Adapting speaking after evidence of misrecognition: Local and global hyperarticulation Export

Speech Communication, Vol. 50, No. 3. (March 2008), pp. 163-178.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


ransofodo's tags for this article

error-response hyperarticulation misrecognition

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

In this paper we examine the two-way relationship between hyperarticulation and evidence of misrecognition of computer-directed speech. We report the results of an experiment in which speakers spoke to a simulated speech recognizer and received text feedback about what had been “recognized”. At pre-determined points in the dialog, recognition errors were staged, and speakers made repairs. Each repair utterance was paired with the utterance preceding the staged recognition error and coded for adaptations associated with hyperarticulate speech: speaking rate and phonetically clear speech. Our results demonstrate that hyperarticulation is a targeted and flexible adaptation rather than a generalized and stable mode of speaking . Hyperarticulation increases after evidence of misrecognition and then decays gradually over several turns in the absence of further misrecognitions. When repairing misrecognized speech, speakers are more likely to clearly articulate constituents that were apparently misrecognized than those either before or after the troublesome constituents, and more likely to clearly articulate content words than function words. Finally, we found no negative impact of hyperarticulation on speech recognition performance.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.