![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
reinhardt's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Does Auditing HE Against Standards Encourage Masterpieces or Paint-by-numbers?by: M. Carroll
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe quality of higher education in Australia is often described in terms of national and international standards. A new entity called the Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA) has been established to audit the manner in which universities, self-accrediting institutions and state accrediting agencies achieve quality higher education. Designing such an audit framework requires consideration of a number of variables, not least being the term 'standards', with a view to recognising the ways in which they affect behaviour within the sector. A framework is presented that addresses the types of standards, the effects of different standards-setters, the manner in which auditees respond to the audit requirement, the manner in which the auditees undertake their task, and a consideration of what effects the audit process has. The paper is presented in two parts; the first develops the analytical framework, and the second uses the framework to explain AUQA's approach to audit.
BibTeX record
RIS record