Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. Export

@article{siebens, h, abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the range of disability in the medically complex and postsurgical populations receiving rehabilitation is adequately sampled by the new Activity Measure--Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC), and to assess whether computer adaptive testing (CAT) can derive valid patient scores using fewer questions. DESIGN: Observational study of 158 subjects (mean age 67.2 yrs) receiving skilled rehabilitation services in inpatient (acute rehabilitation hospitals, skilled nursing facility units) and community (home health services, outpatient departments) settings for recent-onset or worsening disability from medical (excluding neurological) and surgical (excluding orthopedic) conditions. Measures were interviewer-administered activity questions (all patients) and physical functioning portion of the SF-36 (outpatients) and standardized chart items (11 Functional Independence Measure (FIM), 19 Standardized Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) items, and 22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) items). Rasch modeling analyzed all data and the relationship between person ability estimates and average item difficulty. CAT assessed the ability to derive accurate patient scores using a sample of questions. RESULTS: The 163-item activity item pool covered the range of physical movement and personal and instrumental activities. CAT analysis showed comparable scores between estimates using 10 items or the total item pool. CONCLUSION: The AM-PAC can assess a broad range of function in patients with complex medical illness. CAT achieves valid patient scores using fewer questions.}, address = {Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.}, author = {Siebens, H. and Andres, P. L. and Pengsheng, N. and Coster, W. J. and Haley, S. M.}, citeulike-article-id = {2985728}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16205429}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=16205429}, comment = {unavailable, multigroup}, issn = {0894-9115}, journal = {American journal of physical medicine \& rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists}, keywords = {mult-group}, month = {October}, number = {10}, pages = {741--748}, posted-at = {2008-07-10 19:22:05}, priority = {2}, title = {Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach.}, url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16205429}, volume = {84}, year = {2005} }

TY - JOUR ID - siebens, h L3 - citeulike-article-id:2985728 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the range of disability in the medically complex and postsurgical populations receiving rehabilitation is adequately sampled by the new Activity Measure--Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC), and to assess whether computer adaptive testing (CAT) can derive valid patient scores using fewer questions. DESIGN: Observational study of 158 subjects (mean age 67.2 yrs) receiving skilled rehabilitation services in inpatient (acute rehabilitation hospitals, skilled nursing facility units) and community (home health services, outpatient departments) settings for recent-onset or worsening disability from medical (excluding neurological) and surgical (excluding orthopedic) conditions. Measures were interviewer-administered activity questions (all patients) and physical functioning portion of the SF-36 (outpatients) and standardized chart items (11 Functional Independence Measure (FIM), 19 Standardized Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) items, and 22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) items). Rasch modeling analyzed all data and the relationship between person ability estimates and average item difficulty. CAT assessed the ability to derive accurate patient scores using a sample of questions. RESULTS: The 163-item activity item pool covered the range of physical movement and personal and instrumental activities. CAT analysis showed comparable scores between estimates using 10 items or the total item pool. CONCLUSION: The AM-PAC can assess a broad range of function in patients with complex medical illness. CAT achieves valid patient scores using fewer questions. IS - 10 JF - American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists SN - 0894-9115 AD - Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. EP - 748 TI - Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions: a computer adaptive approach. VL - 84 SP - 741 KW - mult-group N1 - unavailable, multigroup AU - Siebens, H AU - Andres, PL AU - Pengsheng, N AU - Coster, WJ AU - Haley, SM PY - 2005/10// UR - http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16205429 ER -