CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation: III. Construct validity and predicting level of care. Export

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Vol. 73, No. 10. (October 1992), pp. 887-892.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


rfieo's tags for this article

rasch rehab

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

rfieo has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

rehab, rasch

rfieo (public note) - 2008-07-25 19:17:36

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

A discriminant analysis was performed using Rasch ability estimates derived from four Patient Evaluation and Conference System (PECS) subscales, to distinguish among the functional independence and impairment profiles exhibited by patients admitted into any of three levels of medical rehabilitation delineated by the National Association of Rehabilitation Facilities (NARF): (1) inpatient hospital, (2) atypical nursing home (intermediate), or (3) day program. Two discriminant functions accounted for 91% and 9% of the between-group variance, respectively. Cross-validated classification of patients into one of the three levels of care, based on discriminant function scores, produced 75% correct classification; a 66% improvement over the percentage of correct classification likely by chance alone. Results support the construct validity of the PECS subscales and indicate they may be useful in validating clinically-based admission decisions among three of the levels of care promulgated by NARF.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.