CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Simple counts of the number of basic ADL dependencies for long-term care research and practice. Export

Health services research, Vol. 25, No. 2. (June 1990), pp. 349-360.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


rfieo's tags for this article

community-dwelling

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

rfieo has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

guttman not better than sum score (but how about 2-para or mokken?)

rfieo (public note) - 2008-07-25 21:00:24

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

General acceptance of a patterned progression of dependency in activities of daily living has led to the widespread practice of simply counting the individual's basic ADL dependencies to reflect his or her self-care needs and level of impairment. This method is convenient, and it is practical to the extent that individuals do fit a scaled pattern of dependency that allows some meaningful comparison among individuals and between groups to be made. This research, based on 3,611 Medicaid cases in Virginia, reports that 36 percent of those individuals screened for nursing home admission do not match a commonly accepted pattern of dependency. The analyses include a logistic regression procedure to explain the characteristics of the "ADL divergent" cases and a Guttman scaling procedure on the ADL data for the sample. Results of the analyses indicate that a Guttman scaling procedure does as well as, but not better than, the original Katz ADL scale, with both scales describing approximately two-thirds of the cases in the sample.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.