Evaluation of current statistical approaches for predictive geomorphological mapping Export

@article{MiskaL2005, abstract = {Predictive models are increasingly used in geomorphology, but systematic evaluations of novel statistical techniques are still limited. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of generalized linear models (GLM), generalized additive models (GAM), classification tree analysis (CTA), neural networks (ANN) and multiple adaptive regression splines (MARS) in predictive geomorphological modelling. Five different distribution models both for non-sorted and sorted patterned ground were constructed on the basis of four terrain parameters and four soil variables. To evaluate the models, the original data set of 9997 squares of 1 ha in size was randomly divided into model training (70\%, n=6998) and model evaluation sets (30\%, n=2999).In general, active sorted patterned ground is clearly defined in upper fell areas with high slope angle and till soils. Active non-sorted patterned ground is more common in valleys with higher soil moisture and fine-scale concave topography. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Kappa value. The relatively high discrimination capacity of all models, AUC=0.85-0.88 and Kappa=0.49-0.56, implies that the model's predictions provide an acceptable index of sorted and non-sorted patterned ground occurrence. The best performance for model calibration data for both data sets was achieved by the CTA. However, when the predictive mapping ability was explored through the evaluation data set, the model accuracies of CTA decreased clearly compared to the other modelling techniques. For model evaluation data MARS performed marginally best.Our results show that the digital elevation model and soil data can be used to predict relatively robustly the activity of patterned ground in fine scale in a subarctic landscape. This indicates that predictive geomorphological modelling has the advantage of providing relevant and useful information on earth surface processes over extensive areas, such data being unavailable through more conventional survey methods.}, author = {Miska, Luoto and Jan, Hjort}, citeulike-article-id = {484082}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.10.006}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V93-4DVW3B6-5/2/e67dff507363b2db60c600d4ff760feb}, day = {30}, doi = {10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.10.006}, journal = {Geomorphology}, keywords = {ann, cta, gam, glm, ground, mars, modelling, patterned}, month = {April}, number = {3-4}, pages = {299--315}, posted-at = {2008-04-13 13:05:35}, priority = {2}, title = {Evaluation of current statistical approaches for predictive geomorphological mapping}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.10.006}, volume = {67}, year = {2005} }

TY - JOUR ID - MiskaL2005 L3 - citeulike-article-id:484082 N2 - Predictive models are increasingly used in geomorphology, but systematic evaluations of novel statistical techniques are still limited. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of generalized linear models (GLM), generalized additive models (GAM), classification tree analysis (CTA), neural networks (ANN) and multiple adaptive regression splines (MARS) in predictive geomorphological modelling. Five different distribution models both for non-sorted and sorted patterned ground were constructed on the basis of four terrain parameters and four soil variables. To evaluate the models, the original data set of 9997 squares of 1 ha in size was randomly divided into model training (70%, n=6998) and model evaluation sets (30%, n=2999).In general, active sorted patterned ground is clearly defined in upper fell areas with high slope angle and till soils. Active non-sorted patterned ground is more common in valleys with higher soil moisture and fine-scale concave topography. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Kappa value. The relatively high discrimination capacity of all models, AUC=0.85-0.88 and Kappa=0.49-0.56, implies that the model's predictions provide an acceptable index of sorted and non-sorted patterned ground occurrence. The best performance for model calibration data for both data sets was achieved by the CTA. However, when the predictive mapping ability was explored through the evaluation data set, the model accuracies of CTA decreased clearly compared to the other modelling techniques. For model evaluation data MARS performed marginally best.Our results show that the digital elevation model and soil data can be used to predict relatively robustly the activity of patterned ground in fine scale in a subarctic landscape. This indicates that predictive geomorphological modelling has the advantage of providing relevant and useful information on earth surface processes over extensive areas, such data being unavailable through more conventional survey methods. IS - 3-4 JF - Geomorphology EP - 315 TI - Evaluation of current statistical approaches for predictive geomorphological mapping VL - 67 SP - 299 KW - ann KW - cta KW - gam KW - glm KW - ground KW - mars KW - modelling KW - patterned AU - Miska, Luoto AU - Jan, Hjort PY - 2005/04/30/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.10.006 ER -