CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Native-speakerism, stereotyping and the collusion of applied linguistics Export

System, Vol. 37, No. 1. (March 2009), pp. 12-22.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


rickl's tags for this article

applied_linguistics native_speaker

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Although, in recent years there have been several advances in critical applied linguistics which have attempted to problematize the ideological underpinnings of language practices, there have in parallel been resistances mounted on the part of traditional applied linguistics that adamantly oppose any form of coming to terms with the political and ideological nature of the discipline. The native speaker and its putative native-speakerism ideology are an exemplary site where the different applied linguistics epistemologies and vested disciplinary interests are contested. In an article published in a recent issue of System , Waters (Waters, A., 2007. Native-speakerism in EL: plus ca change…? System 35, 281–292) argued that native-speakerism critique suffers from serious epistemological and methodological flaws in that it, the argument runs, adopts an under-developed concept of stereotyping and fails to provide empirical evidence in support of the claims it advances. I would argue in this paper that Waters’ (i) position is indicative of the conservatism of applied linguistics to come to terms with its condition of possibility and the deeply ideological and political nature of its practices and (ii) psychologization of stereotyping and ahistorical account of native-speakerism misrepresent the fundamental nature of social reality and applied linguistics practices, and consequently deflect attention from and reproduce the structures of power and inequality that they embody and uphold.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.