CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Outcome prediction in traumatic brain injury: comparison of neurological status, CT findings, and blood levels of S100B and GFAP.

by: M. Wiesmann, E. Steinmeier, O. Magerkurth, J. Linn, D. Gottmann, U. Missler
Acta neurologica Scandinavica, Vol. 121, No. 3. (1 March 2010), pp. 178-185, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01196.x  Key: citeulike:6644268

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

To investigate the predictive value of early serum levels of S100B and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in traumatic brain injury. Sixty patients admitted within 24 h of trauma were included. Neurological status on admission (Glasgow Coma Scale), initial cranial computed tomography (CCT) studies (Marshall Computed Tomographic Classification), and outcome after 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale) were evaluated. S100B and GFAP levels were determined on admission and 24 h after trauma. Blood levels of S100B and GFAP were elevated following head trauma and quantitatively reflected the severity of trauma. S100B levels after 24 h and on admission were of higher predictive value than CCT findings or clinical examination. GFAP, but not S100B levels rapidly declined after trauma. Blood levels of S100B and GFAP indicate the severity of brain damage and are correlated with neurological prognosis after trauma. Both methods can yield additional prognostic information if combined with clinical and CCT findings.


rightHand's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.