![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
robennals's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
QoS's Downfall: At the bottom, or not at all! |
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this articleA good survey of different QoS approaches and why they failed.
Argues that QoS planning must start while it is "clearly unnecessary" as by the time it is necessary it is impossible to retrofit.
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractQuality of Service (QoS) has been touted as a technological requirement for many different networks at many different times. However, very few (if any) schemes for providing it have ever been successful, despite a huge amount of research in the area of QoS provision. In this position paper we analyze some of the reasons why so many QoS mechanisms have failed to be widely deployed. We suggest two factors in this failure: the timeliness of QoS mechanisms (they rarely arrive when they are needed), ...
BibTeX record
RIS record