CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

A 2-Opt Tabu Search Procedure for the Multiperiod Forest Harvesting Problem with Adjacency, Greenup, Old Growth, and Even Flow Constraints Export

Forest Science, Vol. 49 (October 2003)

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


rocarvaj's tags for this article

forestry old-growth

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

<P></P>Because of environmental concerns, modern forest harvesting plans are being modified to address aesthetics and wildlife protection issues. In the literature, the most referenced are adjacency constraints with exclusion or “greenup” years. Also of interest are the concepts of old growth patch size and total old growth area restrictions. Typically, harvest blocks have been defined <I>a priori</I>. Recently, some have proposed a more complex approach in which basic cells are defined, and the decision-making process includes forming harvest blocks from these cells. This has been called ARM (Area Restriction Model). Until now, no successful exact method has been reported for large-scale ARM problems, leaving heuristics as a viable option. In this work we present a multiperiod harvest-scheduling ARM model with these spatial constraints. A tabu search procedure with 2-Opt moves (exchanging at most 2 units) was developed. For small size instances, the procedure found the optimal solution in most cases, and for a real-size problem an 8% optimality gap is provided. FOR. SCI. 49(5):738–751.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.