|
Home
News
Citegeist
|
Browse Groups
Search Groups
Journals
|
FAQs
Howto
Discussion
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Promoting Large, Compact Mature Forest Patches in Harvest Scheduling Modelsby: Sándor Tóth, Marc Mcdill
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this articleMinimize the perimeter of old-growth patches.
Authors study tradeoffs between maximizing NPV and minimizing the perimeter of old-growth patches.
They use an multi-objective approach, looking for Pareto-optimal solutions in the NPV/Diameter plane. Minimum area of old-growth patches is fixed.
PARMIN: A 2-step approach. They search for Pareto-optimal solutions in the NPV/MinArea plane, and the use the MinArea's obtained to solve the Min perimeter formulation.
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting HistoryNEW
AbstractAbstract Spatially explicit harvest scheduling models that can promote the development of dynamic mature forest patches have been proposed in the past. This paper introduces a formulation that extends these models by allowing the total perimeter of the patches to be constrained or minimized. Test run results suggest that the proposed model can produce solutions with fewer, larger, and more compact patches. In addition, patches are more likely to be temporally connected with this formulation. Methods for identifying the tradeoffs between the net present value of the forest and the size and perimeter of the evolving patches are demonstrated for a hypothetical forest.
BibTeX record
RIS record