CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Physician–patient communication in single-bedded versus four-bedded hospital rooms Export

Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 73, No. 2. (November 2008), pp. 215-219.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


rosiemoll333's tags for this article

communication doctor patient

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

To examine whether physician–patient communication in multi-bedded rooms differs from communication in single rooms during ward rounds. Ward rounds in single-bedded patient rooms and ward rounds in four-bedded rooms were audiotaped and analyzed with an adapted version of MIARS. The researcher completed an observational checklist of each encounter. We measured: the duration of speech time, the types of verbal and nonverbal communication, the extent to which patients and physicians raise intimate subjects. Encounters during ward rounds in single rooms significantly took up more time than encounters in four-bedded rooms. The patients asked more questions and made more remarks in single rooms compared to four-bedded rooms. Empathic reactions of the physician were scored significantly more often in single rooms than in four-bedded rooms. No differences were observed concerning the extent to which intimate subjects were brought up. This study is the first that investigated this subject. Findings suggest that single rooms contribute positively to physician–patient communication. The research findings indicate the relevance of taking account of the context in which physician–patient communication takes place.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.