Parallels between Perception without Attention and Perception without Awareness Export

@article{citeulike:116262, abstract = {Do studies of perception without awareness and studies of perception without attention address a similar underlying concept of awareness? To answer this question, we compared qualitative differences in performance across variations in stimulus quality (i.e., short vs. long prime-mask stimulus onset asynchrony) with qualitative differences in performance across variations in the direction of attention (i.e., focused vs. divided). The qualitative differences were based on three different phenomena: Stroop priming, false recognition, and exclusion failure. In all cases, variations in stimulus quality and variations in the direction of attention led to parallel findings. These results suggest that perception with and without awareness and perception with and without attention are equivalent ways of describing the same underlying process distinction.}, address = {University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada}, author = {Merikle, P. M. and Joordens, S.}, citeulike-article-id = {116262}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9245455}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=9245455}, issn = {1053-8100}, journal = {Conscious Cogn}, keywords = {ambient, visualisation}, month = {June}, number = {2/3}, pages = {219--236}, posted-at = {2005-03-07 11:59:42}, priority = {2}, title = {Parallels between Perception without Attention and Perception without Awareness}, url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9245455}, volume = {6}, year = {1997} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:116262 L3 - citeulike-article-id:116262 N2 - Do studies of perception without awareness and studies of perception without attention address a similar underlying concept of awareness? To answer this question, we compared qualitative differences in performance across variations in stimulus quality (i.e., short vs. long prime-mask stimulus onset asynchrony) with qualitative differences in performance across variations in the direction of attention (i.e., focused vs. divided). The qualitative differences were based on three different phenomena: Stroop priming, false recognition, and exclusion failure. In all cases, variations in stimulus quality and variations in the direction of attention led to parallel findings. These results suggest that perception with and without awareness and perception with and without attention are equivalent ways of describing the same underlying process distinction. IS - 2/3 JF - Conscious Cogn SN - 1053-8100 AD - University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada EP - 236 TI - Parallels between Perception without Attention and Perception without Awareness VL - 6 SP - 219 KW - ambient KW - visualisation AU - Merikle, PM AU - Joordens, S PY - 1997/06// UR - http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9245455 ER -