![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
ryanshaw's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War IIby: Gabrielle Hecht
|
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this articleTenets of the French "state engineer" worldview:
- polyvalent knowledge: engineer as both generalist and expert
- vue d'ensemble: a systems view
- une attitude prospective: a systemic approach to planning that incorporates “human, technical, and economic factors... applying qualitative systems thinking to problems that [are] at once technological and social”
- heavy emphasis on real-world experience
Contrast with the American engineer's "technocratic pose": "a stance that rhetorically places technological activity above and beyond the sphere of politics"
Recognizing (as the Franch state engineers did) the political dimensions of of technological projects and respecting political arguments in the technological decision-making process is more honest than pretending that technology is apolitical.
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractIn the aftermath of World War II, as France sought a distinctive role for itself in the modern, postcolonial world, the nation and its leaders enthusiastically embraced large technological projects in general and nuclear power in particular. The Radiance of France asks how it happened that technological prowess and national glory (or "radiance," which also means "radiation" in French) became synonymous in France as nowhere else. To answer this question, Gabrielle Hecht has forged an innovative combination of technology studies and cultural and political history. Focusing on the early history of French nuclear power, Hecht explores the design and development of the reactors, the culture and organization of work at reactor sites, and the ways in which local communities responded to nuclear power and state-directed technological development. She also describes the eventual abandonment of the French (gas-graphite) system in favor of the American (light-water) system and shows how the American system was then "made French." A central argument of her book is that engineers and workers shaped artifacts and practices in a deliberate effort to implement specific political and cultural programs. Combining research in a wealth of previously untapped archival sources with extensive oral interviews, Hecht effectively demonstrates the relationship between history and memory in technological France.
BibTeX record
RIS record