![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
rzach's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Proof Theory of Finite-Valued Logicsby: Richard Zach
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractSeveral people have, since the 1950's, proposed ways to generalize proof theoretic formalisms (sequent calculus, natural deduction, resolution) from the classical to the many-valued case. One particular method for systematically obtaining calculi for all finite-valued logics was invented independently by several researchers, with slight variations in design and presentation. The main aim of this report is to develop the proof theory of finite-valued first order logics in a general way, and to present some of the more important results in this area. This report is actually a template, from which all results can be specialized to particular logics. The main results of this report are: the use of signed formula expressions and partial normal forms to provide a unifying framework in which clause translation calculi, sequent calculi, natural deduction, and also tableaux can be represented; bounds for partial normal forms for general and induced quantifiers; and negative resolution. The cut-elimination theorems extend previous results, and the midsequent theorem, natural deduction systems for many-valued logics as well as results on approximation of axiomatizable propositional logics by many-valued logics are all new.
BibTeX record
RIS record