Identity of Proofs Based on Normalization and Generality Export

@article{citeulike:129528, abstract = {Some thirty years ago, two proposals were made concerning criteria for identity of proofs. Prawitz proposed to analyze identity of proofs in terms of the equivalence relation based on reduction to normal form in natural deduction. Lambek worked on a normalization proposal analogous to Prawitz's, based on reduction to cut-free form in sequent systems, but he also suggested understanding identity of proofs in terms of an equivalence relation based on generality, two derivations having the same generality if after generalizing maximally the rules involved in them they yield the same premises and conclusions up to a renaming of variables. These two proposals proved to be extensionally equivalent only for limited fragments of logic. The normalization proposal stands behind very successful applications of the typed lambda calculus and of category theory in the proof theory of intuitionistic logic. In classical logic, however, it did not fare well. The generality proposal was rather neglected in logic, though related matters were much studied in pure category theory in connection with coherence problems, and there are also links to low-dimensional topology and linear algebra. This proposal seems more promising than the other one for the general proof theory of classical logic.}, author = {Dosen, Kosta}, citeulike-article-id = {129528}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3133721}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/3133721}, doi = {10.2307/3133721}, journal = {The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic}, keywords = {normalization, proof\_theory}, number = {4}, pages = {477--503}, posted-at = {2005-03-16 07:07:48}, priority = {2}, title = {Identity of Proofs Based on Normalization and Generality}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3133721}, volume = {9}, year = {2003} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:129528 L3 - citeulike-article-id:129528 N2 - Some thirty years ago, two proposals were made concerning criteria for identity of proofs. Prawitz proposed to analyze identity of proofs in terms of the equivalence relation based on reduction to normal form in natural deduction. Lambek worked on a normalization proposal analogous to Prawitz's, based on reduction to cut-free form in sequent systems, but he also suggested understanding identity of proofs in terms of an equivalence relation based on generality, two derivations having the same generality if after generalizing maximally the rules involved in them they yield the same premises and conclusions up to a renaming of variables. These two proposals proved to be extensionally equivalent only for limited fragments of logic. The normalization proposal stands behind very successful applications of the typed lambda calculus and of category theory in the proof theory of intuitionistic logic. In classical logic, however, it did not fare well. The generality proposal was rather neglected in logic, though related matters were much studied in pure category theory in connection with coherence problems, and there are also links to low-dimensional topology and linear algebra. This proposal seems more promising than the other one for the general proof theory of classical logic. IS - 4 JF - The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic EP - 503 TI - Identity of Proofs Based on Normalization and Generality VL - 9 SP - 477 KW - normalization KW - proof_theory AU - Dosen, Kosta PY - 2003/// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3133721 ER -