![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
rzach's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Comparing the Complexity of Cut-Elimination MethodsProof Theory in Computer Science: International Seminar, PTCS 2001 Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, October 7-12, 2001, Proceedings (2001), 49.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractWe investigate the relative complexity of two different methods of cut-elimination in classical first-order logic, namely the methods of Gentzen and Tait. We show that the methods are incomparable, in the sense that both can give a nonelementary speed-up of the other one. More precisely we construct two different sequences of LK-proofs with cuts where cut-elimination for one method is elementary and nonelementary for the other one. Moreover we show that there is also a nonelementary difference in complexity for different deterministic versions of Gentzen's method.
BibTeX record
RIS record