![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
sachingarg's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Comparison of OS level and hypervisor server virtualizationIn ISTASC'08: Proceedings of the 8th conference on Systems theory and scientific computation (2008), pp. 241-246.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractAs business needs rapidly grow, more dynamic organizations are required to react sooner and better than competitors. Although the infrastructure is important for all events, but the presented service for costumers is more significant. Nowadays datacenter's flexibility seems to be more critical than ever. The business is more complex to manage and maintain these infrastructures to adapt customer's demands. The virtual architecture would be the best tool to respond the current situation. Server virtualization is a vital layer of virtualization's architecture. In this paper different architectures of server virtualization are compared. The functional and nonfunctional parameters will be discussed in three different types of architecture, without any virtualization, OS level and hypervisor. Fault manageability, scalability and more reliable server farm will be achieved by the virtualization deployment.
BibTeX record
RIS record