CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Phase-encoding strategies for optimal spatial resolution and T1 accuracy in 3D Look-Locker imaging Export

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 25, No. 8. (October 2007), pp. 1203-1214.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


sbaete's tags for this article

3d fastt1 nk07 tomrop

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The Look-Locker (LL) imaging method provides an accurate and efficient approach for mapping the spin-lattice relaxation time, T1. However, the same recovery of signal during LL image acquisition required to estimate T1 also results in unwanted modulation of k-space. This is particularly problematic with 3D LL imaging as the number of phase-encoding steps during the recovery interval (e.g., 16) increases in an effort to reduce imaging times. This modulation of k-space has the effect of introducing a point spread function (PSF), which can lead to either image blurring (if the earlier tip angles are assigned to the centre of k-space) or edge enhancement (if the earlier tip angles are assigned to the edges of k-space), thus corrupting T1 estimation, particularly for small objects. In this study, the PSF and its effect on the acquired images for four different interleaved phase-encode schemes (centric-in, centric-out, sequential and hybrid-sequential) are simulated for a range of T1, tip angle and 3D LL acquisition parameters expected in practice. It is shown by simulation and confirmed experimentally in phantoms that a hybrid sequential phase-encoding scheme reduces image blurring while maintaining T1 accuracy (~2%) and precision (2%) over a range of object sizes down to 2 pixels (2 mm).


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.