![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
schaal's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Semantic Distance in WordNet: An Experimental, Application-oriented Evaluation of Five Measuresby: A. Budanitsky
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractFive different proposed measures of similarity or semantic distance in WordNet were experimentally compared by examining their performance in a real-word spelling correction system. It was found that Jiang and Conrath 's measure gave the best results overall. That of Hirst and St-Onge seriously over-related, that of Resnik seriously under-related, and those of Lin and of Leacock and Chodorow fell in between. 1
BibTeX record
RIS record