Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality Export

@article{citeulike:1250703, abstract = {Using computer databases of scientific papers in physics; biomedical research; and computer science; we have constructed networks of collaboration between scientists in each of these disciplines. In these networks two scientists are considered connected if they have coauthored one or more papers together. Here we study a variety of nonlocal statistics for these networks; such as typical distances between scientists through the network; and measures of centrality such as closeness and betweenness. We further argue that simple networks such as these cannot capture variation in the strength of collaborative ties and propose a measure of collaboration strength based on the number of papers coauthored by pairs of scientists; and the number of other scientists with whom they coauthored those papers.}, author = {Newman, M. E. J.}, citeulike-article-id = {1250703}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRE/v64/i1/e016132}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://link.aps.org/pdf/PRE/v64/i1/e016132}, day = {28}, doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132}, journal = {Physical Review E}, keywords = {collaboration, network, scientific-community}, month = {Jun}, number = {1}, pages = {016132+}, posted-at = {2007-05-01 21:58:04}, priority = {2}, publisher = {American Physical Society}, title = {Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132}, volume = {64}, year = {2001} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1250703 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1250703 N2 - Using computer databases of scientific papers in physics; biomedical research; and computer science; we have constructed networks of collaboration between scientists in each of these disciplines. In these networks two scientists are considered connected if they have coauthored one or more papers together. Here we study a variety of nonlocal statistics for these networks; such as typical distances between scientists through the network; and measures of centrality such as closeness and betweenness. We further argue that simple networks such as these cannot capture variation in the strength of collaborative ties and propose a measure of collaboration strength based on the number of papers coauthored by pairs of scientists; and the number of other scientists with whom they coauthored those papers. IS - 1 JF - Physical Review E TI - Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality PB - American Physical Society VL - 64 SP - 016132 KW - collaboration KW - network KW - scientific-community AU - Newman, MEJ PY - 2001/Jun/28/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132 ER -