![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
shahjehanhakim's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
The myth of non-overlapping channels: interference measurements in IEEE 802.11Wireless on Demand Network Systems and Services, 2007. WONS '07. Fourth Annual Conference on In Wireless on Demand Network Systems and Services, 2007. WONS '07. Fourth Annual Conference on (26 January 2007), pp. 1-8.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractIt has become a widely accepted assumption that multiple IEEE 802.11b/g transmissions in physical proximity can coexist without interfering each other. This is claimed to be the case when using separate channels with a minimum distance of 25 MHz, e.g. channel 1 and 6, which are often referred to as non-overlapping. In contrast we show that in practice cross-channel interference can be present also between non-overlapping channels if the interfering transmitter is in the proximity of the receiver. This phenomenon is known as the "near-far effect" in wireless communications. On IEEE 802.11 this has two main effects: frame corruption due to increased interference noise and channel blocking due to spurious carrier detection. The problem can be particularly serious when using IEEE 802.11 technology to build multi-hop mesh networks. Through an extensive set of experiments with off-the-shelf certified WiFi chipsets we demonstrate the presence and the detrimental effects of cross-channel interference between non-overlapping channels. We adopt an incremental approach: we first consider the case of unacknowledged broadcast packets, then we extend to regular UDP streams, finally we provide preliminary results for multi-hop TCP flows
BibTeX record
RIS record