CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Wifi-Reports: Improving Wireless Network Selection with Collaboration Export

edited by: Jason Flinn, Anthony LaMarca

In Mobisys 2009, 7th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services (22 June 2009), pp. 123-136.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


shtrom's tags for this article

collaborative collection database hasref metrics performance wireless

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

shtrom has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

References: 32, 34, 36, 38 (AP performance metrics); 20, 21 (untraceable e-cash); 3 HTTP analyzer

shtrom (public note) - 2009-10-01 13:14:00

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Wi-Fi clients can obtain much better performance at some commercial hotspots than at others. Unfortunately, there is currently no way for users to determine which hotspot access points (APs) will be sufficient to run their applications before purchasing access. To address this problem, this paper presents Wifi-Reports , a collaborative service that provides Wi-Fi clients with historical information about AP performance and application support. The key research challenge in Wifi-Reports is to obtain accurate user-submitted reports. This is challenging because two conflicting goals must be addressed in a practical system: preserving the privacy of users' reports and limiting fraudulent reports. We introduce a practical cryptographic protocol that achieves both goals, and we address the important engineering challenges in building Wifi-Reports. Using a measurement study of commercial APs in Seattle, we show that Wifi-Reports would improve performance over previous AP selection approaches in 30%-60% of locations.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.