![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
sickboyedd's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Responses of parasitized and unparasitized Common Redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) populations against artificial Cuckoo parasitism |
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this article011UGTimes Cited:0Cited References Count:32
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractBrood parasitism selects for defensive mechanisms that enhance host fitness. Therefore, host Populations under different parasitism pressures may express different levels of defense against brood parasites. We tested the rejection responses Of Currently parasitized and unparasitized Common Red start (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) populations in Finland to artificial Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs. We predicted a higher level of defense in the parasitized population, but in fact the rejection rate was higher in the nonparasitized population. Nonmimetic artificial eggs were rejected more often than mimetic ones. Desertion probability was higher in the nonparasitized population and was independent of artificial egg type. Common Redstarts in the parasitized Population rejected the artificial eggs mostly through ejection, whereas desertion was a more frequent rejection method in the non parasitized Population. Our results Suggest that current selection pressures from brood parasites do not always explain the Current levels of defense.
BibTeX record
RIS record