CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Feedback on AAC intervention from adults who are temporarily unable to speak Export

Augmentative & Alternative Communication (March 1991), pp. 43-50.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


simonjudge's tags for this article

aac usability

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

simonjudge has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

AAC in ICU

simonjudge (public note) - 2009-10-22 18:43:40

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess through retrospective patient interviews the effectiveness of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions in acute care medical settings. Five adults with temporary severe expressive communication disabilities in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) due to Guillain-Barre syndrome or botulism were interviewed. Each adult used AAC techniques during the acute phase of their illness when oral speech was not functional. Interviews centered around: the AAC techniques that were introduced in the ICU; reactions of communication partners to AAC approaches; fears and frustrations with speechlessness and AAC approaches; successes and failures of augmented communication; and suggestions for future AAC intervention. Satisfaction with aided expression was reported for about 85% of the interventions. These adults suggested that multiple, simultaneous techniques are most useful. They requested inservice training of all ICU staff with AAC techniques. They considered family training and acceptance of communication alternatives as crucial to success. Nonelectronic approaches were preferred over electronic approaches. Continual patience was one of the most important intervention requirements for the temporary user.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.