A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research Export

@article{citeulike:3513034, abstract = {The authors discuss the components of consensual qualitative research (CQR) using open-ended questions to gather data, using words to describe phenomena, studying a few cases intensively, recognizing the importance of context, using an inductive analytic process, using a team and making decisions by consensus, using auditors, and verifying results by systematically checking against the raw data. The three steps for conducting CQR are developing and coding domains, constructing core ideas, and developing categories to describe consistencies across cases (cross analysis). Criteria for evaluating CQR are trustworthiness of the method, coherence of the results, representativeness of the results to the sample, testimonial validity, applicability of the results, and replicability across samples. Finally, the authors discuss implications for research, practice, and training. 10.1177/0011000097254001}, author = {Hill, Clara E. and Thompson, Barbara J. and Williams, Elizabeth N.}, citeulike-article-id = {3513034}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://tcp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/517}, day = {1}, journal = {The Counseling Psychologist}, keywords = {qualitative, uppsats}, month = {October}, number = {4}, pages = {517--572}, posted-at = {2008-11-14 13:42:13}, priority = {2}, title = {A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research}, url = {http://tcp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/517}, volume = {25}, year = {1997} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:3513034 L3 - citeulike-article-id:3513034 N2 - The authors discuss the components of consensual qualitative research (CQR) using open-ended questions to gather data, using words to describe phenomena, studying a few cases intensively, recognizing the importance of context, using an inductive analytic process, using a team and making decisions by consensus, using auditors, and verifying results by systematically checking against the raw data. The three steps for conducting CQR are developing and coding domains, constructing core ideas, and developing categories to describe consistencies across cases (cross analysis). Criteria for evaluating CQR are trustworthiness of the method, coherence of the results, representativeness of the results to the sample, testimonial validity, applicability of the results, and replicability across samples. Finally, the authors discuss implications for research, practice, and training. 10.1177/0011000097254001 IS - 4 JF - The Counseling Psychologist EP - 572 TI - A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research VL - 25 SP - 517 KW - qualitative KW - uppsats AU - Hill, Clara AU - Thompson, Barbara AU - Williams, Elizabeth PY - 1997/10/01/ UR - http://tcp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/517 ER -