![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
smogit's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Lazy Systematic Unit Testing: JWalk versus JUnitTesting: Academic and Industrial Conference Practice and Research Techniques - MUTATION, 2007. TAICPART-MUTATION 2007 In Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference Practice and Research Techniques - MUTATION, 2007. TAICPART-MUTATION 2007 (2007), pp. 138-138.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractLazy systematic unit testing with JWalk is compared against regression testing with JUnit, the leading agile testing tool. JWalk produced exhaustive test sets more quickly and recalculated full state and transition coverage, when testing modified or extended classes. For the same time and effort invested, JWalk tested up to two orders of magnitude more paths than manual tests created for JUnit by an expert tester.
BibTeX record
RIS record