CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Lazy Systematic Unit Testing: JWalk versus JUnit Export

Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference Practice and Research Techniques - MUTATION, 2007. TAICPART-MUTATION 2007 In Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference Practice and Research Techniques - MUTATION, 2007. TAICPART-MUTATION 2007 (2007), pp. 138-138.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


smogit's tags for this article

jwalk testing

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Lazy systematic unit testing with JWalk is compared against regression testing with JUnit, the leading agile testing tool. JWalk produced exhaustive test sets more quickly and recalculated full state and transition coverage, when testing modified or extended classes. For the same time and effort invested, JWalk tested up to two orders of magnitude more paths than manual tests created for JUnit by an expert tester.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.