CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Tumour grading from magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a comparison of feature extraction with variable selection. Export

Stat Med, Vol. 22, No. 1. (15 January 2003), pp. 147-164.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


sparfait's tags for this article

extraction feature mrs

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) provides a non-invasive measurement of the biochemistry of living tissue. However, signal variation due to tissue heterogeneity causes considerable mixing between different disease categories, making accurate class assignments difficult. This paper compares a systematic methodology for classifier design using multivariate bayesian variable selection (MBVS), with one based on feature extraction using independent component analysis (ICA). We illustrate the methodology and assess the classification performance using a data set comprising 41 magnetic resonance spectra acquired in vivo from two grades of brain tumour, namely low- and medium-grade astrocytic tumours, labelled astrocytomas (AST), and high-grade gliomas and glioblastomas labelled glioblastomas (GL). The aim of this study is threefold. First, to describe the application of the alternative methodologies to MRS, then to benchmark their classification performance, and finally to interpret the classification models in terms of biologically relevant signals derived from the spectra. The classification performance is assessed using the bootstrap method and by application to a test sample in a retrospective study.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.