![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
stavros's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Understanding planning with incomplete information and sensingby: Marcelo Oglietti
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractPKS is the framework for planning with incomplete information and sensing recently introduced by Bacchus and Petrick [Proc. KR'98, pp. 432-443]. The fact that PKS generalizes STRIPS to domains with incomplete information and sensing opens up the possibility of proposing it as a reference for comparisons with other formalisms that approach the problem from different perspectives.To this end we first provide a formal semantics for PKS, then analyze and extend it. The formal definition of the extended PKS entails the identification of a number of properties of this planning framework. In particular, we prove that for any finite instance of the PKS planning problem the reachable states are finite; on the basis of this result we propose an improved planning algorithm that is not only sound, as the one proposed by Petrick and Bacchus [Proc. AIPS'02, pp. 212-221], but also complete.We extend PKS to include conditional plans with cycles and introduce the distinction between different classes of solutions: strong, strong cyclic, weak acyclic and weak cyclic. In contrast with current belief, we prove that some weak acyclic solutions are more likely to succeed for a limited execution than some strong cyclic solutions, revealing the lack of a method for judging the quality of different solutions. Finally, we introduce a quality measure for solutions of any class, and a quantitative method for comparing them.
BibTeX record
RIS record