![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
stefanherzog's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanismsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 98, No. 2. (November 2005), pp. 133-143.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractJudgmental anchoring--the assimilation of a numeric estimate towards a previously considered standard--is an exceptionally ubiquitous effect that influences human judgment in a variety of domains and paradigms. Three studies examined whether anchoring effects even occur, if anchor values are presented subliminally, outside of judges' awareness. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate such subliminal anchoring effects: judges assimilated target estimates towards the subliminally presented anchor values. Study 3 further demonstrates that subliminal anchors produced a selective increase in the accessibility of anchor-consistent target knowledge. The implications of these findings for the ubiquity of judgmental anchoring, its different underlying mechanisms, and comparative information processing are discussed.
BibTeX record
RIS record