An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement Export

@article{citeulike:377734, abstract = {Misattributions people make about their own affective reactions can be used to measure attitudes implicitly. Combining the logic of projective tests with advances in priming research, the affect misattribution procedure (AMP) was sensitive to normatively favorable and unfavorable evaluations (Experiments 1-4), and the misattribution effect was strong at both fast and slow presentation rates (Experiments 3 and 4). Providing further evidence of validity, the AMP was strongly related to individual differences in self-reported political attitudes and voting intentions (Experiment 5). In the socially sensitive domain of racial attitudes, the AMP showed in-group bias for Black and White participants. AMP performance correlated with explicit racial attitudes, a relationship that was moderated by motivations to control prejudice (Experiment 6). Across studies, the task was unaffected by direct warnings to avoid bias. Advantages of the AMP include large effect sizes, high reliability, ease of use, and resistance to correction attempts.}, author = {Payne, Keith B. and Cheng, Clara M. and Govorun, Olesya and Stewart, Brandon D.}, citeulike-article-id = {377734}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://content.apa.org/journals/psp/89/3/277}, journal = {Journal of Personality and Social Psychology}, keywords = {affect, attitude, implicit, social-cognition}, month = {September}, number = {3}, pages = {277--293}, posted-at = {2005-11-02 11:58:17}, priority = {3}, title = {An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement}, url = {http://content.apa.org/journals/psp/89/3/277}, volume = {89}, year = {2005} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:377734 L3 - citeulike-article-id:377734 N2 - Misattributions people make about their own affective reactions can be used to measure attitudes implicitly. Combining the logic of projective tests with advances in priming research, the affect misattribution procedure (AMP) was sensitive to normatively favorable and unfavorable evaluations (Experiments 1-4), and the misattribution effect was strong at both fast and slow presentation rates (Experiments 3 and 4). Providing further evidence of validity, the AMP was strongly related to individual differences in self-reported political attitudes and voting intentions (Experiment 5). In the socially sensitive domain of racial attitudes, the AMP showed in-group bias for Black and White participants. AMP performance correlated with explicit racial attitudes, a relationship that was moderated by motivations to control prejudice (Experiment 6). Across studies, the task was unaffected by direct warnings to avoid bias. Advantages of the AMP include large effect sizes, high reliability, ease of use, and resistance to correction attempts. IS - 3 JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology EP - 293 TI - An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement VL - 89 SP - 277 KW - affect KW - attitude KW - implicit KW - social-cognition AU - Payne, Keith AU - Cheng, Clara AU - Govorun, Olesya AU - Stewart, Brandon PY - 2005/09// UR - http://content.apa.org/journals/psp/89/3/277 ER -