CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

The Reliability and Validity of Weighted Composite Scores Export

Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 17, No. 3. (2004), pp. 221-240.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


swools's tags for this article

reliability validity

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The scores on 2 distinct tests (e.g., essay and objective) are often combined to create a composite score, which is used to make decisions. The validity of the observed composite can sometimes be evaluated relative to an external criterion. However, in cases where no criterion is available, the observed composite has generally been evaluated in terms of its reliability. The analyses in this article are based on a simple, content-based model for the validity of the observed composite as an estimate of a target composite, based on a priori weights for the 2 tests. The results suggest that giving extra weight to the more reliable of the 2 observed scores tends to improve the reliability of the composite, and up to a point tends to improve its validity. Giving too much weight to the more reliable score can decrease the validity of the observed composite as a measure of the target composite.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.