CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Comparison of Biochemical, Molecular, and Visual Methods to Quantify Phaeocryptopus gaeumannii in Douglas-Fir Foliage

by: L. M. Winton, D. K. Manter, J. K. Stone, E. M. Hansen
Phytopathology, Vol. 93, No. 1. (January 2003), pp. 121-126, doi:10.1094/phyto.2003.93.1.121  Key: citeulike:11541362

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

A recent epidemic of Swiss needle cast along the Oregon coast has prompted efforts to quantify foliar infection and colonization of the causal agent Phaeocryptopus gaeumannii. In this paper, we compare four methods to quantify colonization of Douglas-fir foliage by P. gaeumannii: fruiting body abundance, ergosterol content, dot blot analysis, and TaqMan based real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results from the four techniques were all significantly correlated. Fruiting body density and quantitative PCR are two methods least affected by the presence of other needle fungi and had the highest correlation. The methods also were used to compare foliage colonization in nine field sites exhibiting a range of disease severity. All four methods provided evidence that sites differed in the degree of fungal colonization, but only quantitative PCR consistently separated sites with moderate to severe levels of disease from sites with low disease estimated by foliage color, canopy density, and growth measurements.


sylvirgro's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.