CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Little Higgs theory confronted with the LHC Higgs data

by: Xiao-Fang Han, Lei Wang, Jin M. Yang, Jingya Zhu
Physical Review D, Vol. 87, No. 5. (14 Jan 2013), doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.055004  Key: citeulike:12154689

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

We confront the little Higgs theory with the LHC Higgs search data (up to 17 fb$^-1$ of the combined 7 and 8 TeV run). Considering some typical models, namely the littlest Higgs model (LH), the littlest Higgs model with T-parity (LHT-A and LHT-B) and the simplest little Higgs model (SLH), we scan over the parameter space in the region allowed by current experiments. We find that in these models the inclusive and exclusive (via gluon-gluon fusion) diphoton and $ZZ^*$ signal rates of the Higgs boson are always suppressed and approach to the SM predictions for a large scale $f$. Thus, the $ZZ^*$ signal rate is within the $1σ$ range of the experimental data while the inclusive diphoton signal rate is always outside the $2σ$ range. Especially, in the LHT-A the diphoton signal rate is outside the $3σ$ range of the experimental data for $f < 800$ GeV. We also perform a global $χ^2$ fit to the available LHC and Tevatron Higgs data, and find that these models provide no better global fit to the whole data set (only for some special channels a better fit can be obtained, specially in the LHT-B).


terning's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.