CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Effects of pH and carbon sources on biohydrogen production by co-culture of Clostridium butyricum and Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

by: Jung-Yeol Y. Lee, Xue-Jiao J. Chen, Eun-Jung J. Lee, Kyung-Sok S. Min
Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, Vol. 22, No. 3. (March 2012), pp. 400-406  Key: citeulike:11410704

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

To improve the hydrogen yield from biological fermentation of organic wastewater, a co-culture system of dark- and photo-fermentation bacteria was investigated. In a pureculture system of the dark-fermentation bacterium Clostridium butyricum, a pH of 6.25 was found to be optimal, resulting in a hydrogen production rate of 18.7 ml-H₂/l/h. On the other hand, the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides could produce the most hydrogen at 1.81 mol-H₂/mol-glucose at pH 7.0. The maximum specific growth rate of R. sphaeroides was determined to be 2.93 h⁻¹ when acetic acid was used as the carbon source, a result that was significantly higher than that obtained using either glucose or a mixture of volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Acetic acid best supported R. sphaeroides cell growth but not hydrogen production. In the co-culture system with glucose, hydrogen could be steadily produced without any lag phase. There were distinguishable inflection points in a plot of accumulated hydrogen over time, resulting from the dynamic production or consumption of VFAs by the interaction between the dark- and photofermentation bacteria. Lastly, the hydrogen production rate of a repeated fed-batch run was 15.9 ml-H₂/l/h, which was achievable in a sustainable manner.


thiana's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.