CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Suspension criteria for image monitors and viewing boxes

by: A. Tingberg
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 153, No. 2. (01 February 2013), pp. 230-235, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs302  Key: citeulike:12028238

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Image monitors and viewing boxes have a crucial role in the diagnostic process. Modern radiology uses different modalities to produce digital images which are to be viewed in different parts of the radiology department and throughout the hospital, sometimes simultaneously, via the Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). Therefore, the quality of the image monitors is of great importance. IPEM notes that inadequacies in the imaging viewing area may serve to negate the benefits of other efforts made to maintain quality and consistency. Suspension criteria for diagnostic image monitors and viewing boxes are presented in RP162. These criteria are mainly based on two documents, IPEM report 91, ‘Recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic x-ray imaging systems’ (2005) and AAPM on-line report no. 03, ‘Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems’ (2005). The development of common European suspension levels for image monitors and viewing boxes will be a valuable tool in quality assurance.


thor_bjarnason's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.