Processing of Kinetically Defined Boundaries in Areas V1 and V2 of the Macaque Monkey Export

@article{Marcar2000ProcessingV1, abstract = {Marcar, V. L., S. E. Raiguel, D. Xiao, and G. A. Orban. Processing of Kinetically Defined Boundaries in Areas V1 and V2 of the Macaque Monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 2786-2798, 2000. We recorded responses in 107 cells in the primary visual area V1 and 113 cells in the extrastriate visual area V2 while presenting a kinetically defined edge or a luminance contrast edge. Cells meeting statistical criteria for responsiveness and orientation selectivity were classified as selective for the orientation of the kinetic edge if the preferred orientation for a kinetic boundary stimulus remained essentially the same even when the directions of the two motion components defining that boundary were changed by 90{degrees}. In area V2, 13 of the 113 cells met all three requirements, whereas in V1, only 4 cells met the criteria of 107 that were tested, and even these demonstrated relatively weak selectivity. Correlation analysis showed that V1 and V2 populations differed greatly (P < 1.0 x 10[-]6, Student's t-test) in their selectively for specific orientations of kinetic edge stimuli. Neurons in V2 that were selective for the orientation of a kinetic boundary were further distinguished from their counterparts in V1 in displaying a strong, sharply tuned response to a luminance edge of the same orientation. We concluded that selectivity for the orientation of kinetically defined boundaries first emerges in area V2 rather than in primary visual cortex. An analysis of response onset latencies in V2 revealed that cells selective for the orientation of the motion-defined boundary responded about 40 ms more slowly, on average, to the kinetic edge stimulus than to a luminance edge. In nonselective cells, that is, those presumably responding only to the local motion in the stimulus, this difference was only about 20 ms. Response latencies for the luminance edge were indistinguishable in KE-selective and -nonselective neurons. We infer that while responses to luminance edges or local motion are indigenous to V2, KE-selective responses may involve feedback entering the ventral stream at a point downstream with respect to V2.}, author = {Marcar, V. L. and Raiguel, S. E. and Xiao, D. and Orban, G. A.}, citeulike-article-id = {5957345}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://jn.physiology.org/content/84/6/2786.abstract}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://jn.physiology.org/content/84/6/2786.full.pdf}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11110809}, citeulike-linkout-3 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=11110809}, day = {1}, journal = {J Neurophysiol}, keywords = {boundary, electrophysiology, monkey, motion, v1, v2}, month = {December}, number = {6}, pages = {2786--2798}, posted-at = {2009-10-17 21:07:37}, priority = {5}, title = {Processing of Kinetically Defined Boundaries in Areas V1 and V2 of the Macaque Monkey}, url = {http://jn.physiology.org/content/84/6/2786.abstract}, volume = {84}, year = {2000} }

TY - JOUR ID - Marcar2000ProcessingV1 L3 - citeulike-article-id:5957345 N2 - Marcar, V. L., S. E. Raiguel, D. Xiao, and G. A. Orban. Processing of Kinetically Defined Boundaries in Areas V1 and V2 of the Macaque Monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 2786-2798, 2000. We recorded responses in 107 cells in the primary visual area V1 and 113 cells in the extrastriate visual area V2 while presenting a kinetically defined edge or a luminance contrast edge. Cells meeting statistical criteria for responsiveness and orientation selectivity were classified as selective for the orientation of the kinetic edge if the preferred orientation for a kinetic boundary stimulus remained essentially the same even when the directions of the two motion components defining that boundary were changed by 90{degrees}. In area V2, 13 of the 113 cells met all three requirements, whereas in V1, only 4 cells met the criteria of 107 that were tested, and even these demonstrated relatively weak selectivity. Correlation analysis showed that V1 and V2 populations differed greatly (P < 1.0 x 10[-]6, Student's t-test) in their selectively for specific orientations of kinetic edge stimuli. Neurons in V2 that were selective for the orientation of a kinetic boundary were further distinguished from their counterparts in V1 in displaying a strong, sharply tuned response to a luminance edge of the same orientation. We concluded that selectivity for the orientation of kinetically defined boundaries first emerges in area V2 rather than in primary visual cortex. An analysis of response onset latencies in V2 revealed that cells selective for the orientation of the motion-defined boundary responded about 40 ms more slowly, on average, to the kinetic edge stimulus than to a luminance edge. In nonselective cells, that is, those presumably responding only to the local motion in the stimulus, this difference was only about 20 ms. Response latencies for the luminance edge were indistinguishable in KE-selective and -nonselective neurons. We infer that while responses to luminance edges or local motion are indigenous to V2, KE-selective responses may involve feedback entering the ventral stream at a point downstream with respect to V2. IS - 6 JF - J Neurophysiol EP - 2798 TI - Processing of Kinetically Defined Boundaries in Areas V1 and V2 of the Macaque Monkey VL - 84 SP - 2786 KW - boundary KW - electrophysiology KW - monkey KW - motion KW - v1 KW - v2 AU - Marcar, VL AU - Raiguel, SE AU - Xiao, D AU - Orban, GA PY - 2000/12/01/ UR - http://jn.physiology.org/content/84/6/2786.abstract ER -