CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks Export

Nature, Vol. 441, No. 7092. (25 May 2006), pp. 502-505.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


tnhh's tags for this article

cooperation game-theory social-networks

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

A fundamental aspect of all biological systems is cooperation. Cooperative interactions are required for many levels of biological organization ranging from single cells to groups of animals1, 2, 3, 4. Human society is based to a large extent on mechanisms that promote cooperation5, 6, 7. It is well known that in unstructured populations, natural selection favours defectors over cooperators. There is much current interest, however, in studying evolutionary games in structured populations and on graphs8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. These efforts recognize the fact that who-meets-whom is not random, but determined by spatial relationships or social networks18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. Here we describe a surprisingly simple rule that is a good approximation for all graphs that we have analysed, including cycles, spatial lattices, random regular graphs, random graphs and scale-free networks25, 26: natural selection favours cooperation, if the benefit of the altruistic act, b, divided by the cost, c, exceeds the average number of neighbours, k, which means b/c > k. In this case, cooperation can evolve as a consequence of 'social viscosity' even in the absence of reputation effects or strategic complexity.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.