CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Non-Cooperative Bargaining Theory: An Introduction Export

The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 53, No. 5. (1986), pp. 709-724.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

toomash has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

Has easier proof for Rubinstein (1982, Econometrica) main theorem. Originally published in some of his earlier papers.

toomash (public note) - 2005-03-31 23:09:09

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The paper provides an informal introduction to some of the main themes of the recent literature on "non-cooperative" or ßequential" bargaining models. It focuses in particular on the relationship between the new approach and the traditional axiomatic approach exemplified by "Nash bargaining theory". It illustrates the new insights offered by the non-cooperative approach, by reference to a detailed analysis of the manner in which the presence of an outside option available to one of the parties will affect the negotiated outcome. Finally, the difficulties which arise in extending this analysis to two-person bargaining with incomplete information, and to n-person bargaining, are discussed. This is a revised version of the fourth Review of Economic Studies Lecture presented in April 1985 at the joint meeting of the Association of University Teachers of Economics and the Royal Economic Society held in Oxford. The choice of lecturer is made by a panel whose members are currently Professors Hahn, Mirrlees and Nobay, and the paper is refereed in the usual way.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.