Register | Log in | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle

by: Shlomo Benartzi, Richard H Thaler
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 1. (1995), pp. 73-92.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Notes for this article

toomash has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

They apply prospect theory and find that myopic loss aversion provides an explanation to the puzzle. The story: investors evaluate their portfolio in a relatively short sighted way, loss aversion implies, they are highly sensitive to losses over this time period. The evaluation time period implied in their model by a 6% equity premium and a 2x loss aversion multiplier is approximately one year.

toomash (public note) - 2005-04-09 12:18:29

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

The equity premium puzzle refers to the empirical fact that stocks have outperformed bonds over the last century by a surprisingly large margin. We offer a new explanation based on two behavioral concepts. First, investors are assumed to be "loss averse," meaning that they are distinctly more sensitive to losses than to gains. Second, even long-term investors are assumed to evaluate their portfolios frequently. We dub this combination "myopic loss aversion." Using simulations, we find that the size of the equity premium is consistent with the previously estimated parameters of prospect theory if investors evaluate their portfolios annually.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.