Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium pointsby: John C Harsanyi
International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 2, No. 1. (December 1973), pp. 1-23.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractEquilibrium points in mixed strategies seem to be unstable, because any player can deviate without penalty from his equilibrium strategy even if he expects all other players to stick to theirs. This paper proposes a model under which most mixed-strategy equilibrium points have full stability. It is argued that for any gameGamma the players' uncertainty about the other players' exact payoffs can be modeled as a disturbed gameGamma *, i.e., as a game with small random fluctuations in the payoffs. Any equilibrium point inGamma, whether it is in pure or in mixed strategies, can ldquoalmost alwaysrdquo be obtained as a limit of a pure-strategy equilibrium point in the corresponding disturbed gameGamma * when all disturbances go to zero. Accordingly, mixed-strategy equilibrium points are stable — even though the players may make no deliberate effort to use their pure strategies with the probability weights prescribed by their mixed equilibrium strategies — because the random fluctuations in their payoffs willmake them use their pure strategies approximately with the prescribed probabilities.
BibTeX record
RIS record