CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Designing seeds for similarity search in genomic DNA

by: Jeremy Buhler, Uri Keich, Yanni Sun
Journal of Computer and System Sciences, Vol. 70, No. 3. (May 2005), pp. 342-363, doi:10.1016/j.jcss.2004.12.003  Key: citeulike:1560664

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Large-scale comparison of genomic DNA is of fundamental importance in annotating functional elements of genomes. To perform large comparisons efficiently, BLAST (Methods: Companion Methods Enzymol 266 (1996) 460, J. Mol. Biol. 215 (1990) 403, Nucleic Acids Res. 25(17) (1997) 3389) and other widely used tools use seeded alignment, which compares only sequences that can be shown to share a common pattern or “seed’’ of matching bases. The literature suggests that the choice of seed substantially affects the sensitivity of seeded alignment, but designing and evaluating seeds is computationally challenging. This work addresses the problem of designing a seed to optimize performance of seeded alignment. We give a fast, simple algorithm based on finite automata for evaluating the sensitivity of a seed in a Markov model of ungapped alignments, along with extensions to mixtures and inhomogeneous Markov models. We give intuition and theoretical results on which seeds are good choices. Finally, we describe Mandala, a software tool for seed design, and show that it can be used to improve the sensitivity of alignment in practice.


torbennielsen's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.