CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Attitudes Toward Capital Punishment: Preference for the Penalty or Mere Acceptance? Export

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 32, No. 2. (1 May 1995), pp. 191-213.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


ttrick's tags for this article

capital punishment-rehabilitation

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Recent reports of general favorability toward capital punishment suggest that there is tremendous support for the penalty. Research also suggests, however, that people prefer meaningful alternative sentences and that there is a reluctance to endorse capital punishment for juveniles and defendants who are mentally retarded. Using a quota sampling procedure, 514 Indiana citizens were asked about these specific circumstances surrounding capital punishment and about their support for various goals of sentencing. The results suggest that although general favorability toward capital punishment is quite high (76%), such a result is misleading. Only 9% of general proponents of capital punishment maintain their support for the penalty under all circumstances questioned. Moreover, gender of respondents and support for inmates' right to rehabilitation consistently distinguish between degrees of support for capital punishment. The findings have important implications for practical legal issues, such as the selection of capital jurors, as well as for theoretical issues related to the determinants of punitiveness toward lawbreakers. 10.1177/0022427895032002004


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.