To insert individual citation into a bibliography in a word-processor,
select your preferred citation style below and drag-and-drop it into the document.
Systematic Biology, Vol. 59, No. 5. (1 October 2010), pp. 491-503, doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq039 Key: citeulike:11598365
Formatted Citation
Show HTML
Likes
(beta)
This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.
We propose a method for delimiting species based on dominant or codominant multilocus data using Gaussian clustering with a noise component for outliers. Case studies show that provisional species delimited using Gaussian clustering based on dominant multilocus data correspond well with provisional species delimited based on other data. However, the performance of Gaussian clustering in delimiting species based on few codominant markers was only moderate. Species represented by few individuals are usually included in the noise component because clusters are difficult to recognize with limited data. As alternative methods, we evaluated two model-based clustering methods originally proposed to infer population structure and assign individuals to populations based on the assumption of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium within populations, namely STRUCTURE and STRUCTURAMA, as well as the “fields for recombination” approach. The latter resulted in lumping all individuals of each data set with codominant markers together, and whereas STRUCTURE often provides no decision about the number of clusters, STRUCTURAMA usually yields correct or almost correct numbers of clusters. The classification success of STRUCTURAMA analyses based on codominant markers was very good, but its performance with dominant markers was less consistent. Based on the classification success of the different methods for delimiting species with dominant and codominant multilocus markers in the case studies, we recommend using Gaussian clustering for data sets with dominant markers and STRUCTURAMA for data sets with codominant markers.
Starts with a brief discussion of problems with using sequence data for species delimitation: reliance on a single, uniparental locus is a big problem, and acquiring multiple independent loci is still an arduous process. gaussian clustering of AFLP data, and structurama analysis of microsats provided the best results (consistent with previous work on these groups). structurama is based on identifying groups at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, which doesn't make sense for AFLPs. On the other hand, gaussian clustering performs best with the high information content of AFLP markers. The fields for recombination approach sucked rocks.
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.