To insert individual citation into a bibliography in a word-processor,
select your preferred citation style below and drag-and-drop it into the document.
Key: citeulike:12027594
Formatted Citation
Show HTML
Likes
(beta)
This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.
Digital content owners have attempted to use content poisoning to disrupt illegal distribution of copyrighted files in peer-to-peer (P2P) systems. This paper provides an analytical model to quantify the impact of content poisoning. Tradeoffs between content poisoning and download efficiency are revealed. In particular, we apply this poisoning model to transform and evaluate three popular P2P networks: BitTorrent, eDonkey, and eMule, for copyright-protected content delivery. We find that chunking protocol, hashing scheme, peer selection, decoy number, and decoy blacklisting play crucial roles to prevent illegal file distribution over P2P networks. We discover that BitTorrent is most resistant to content poisoning. Index poisoning could be a viable alternative to cope with copyright violation on BitTorrent. The eDonkey is less resistant to content poisoning than eMule. A new challenge-response protocol (CRP) is proposed using majority-vote on multiple chunk copies received. To control the level of poisoning, we adapt repeated peer selection (RPS) and decoy blacklisting techniques. Both eDonkey and eMule can apply CRP, RPS, and blacklisting to perform fine tuning of the content poisoning process. These mechanisms can transform eMule to become less resistant than eDonkey, which will serve the best interest of content owners. Finally, we elaborate on integrated research tasks needed to achieve seamless copyright protection in P2P networks. Keywords: Peer-to-Peer systems, content delivery, copyright protection, content poisoning, chunking protocols, decoy deployment, distributed file sharing, P2P reputation systems,
Q1: What is the article subject area?
measures being taken by intellectual property holders to disrupt illegal torrenting
Q2: Why was this article interesting to you?
i was not aware that content poisoning existed much less that it was used to combat pirating its a very interesting idea
Q3: How does this article relate to your project?
if content poisoning is sometimes even done by the owners of the intellectual property that has significant meaning when looking at the validity of torrent files available. I might have to consider trying to find out if a bad file was put there by someone trying to spread a virus or the owners of the content themselves to discourage pirating.
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.